You said you wanted truthful opinions so here goes:
The story didn't grab me at any point. I didn't really like the dog attack near the start- I understand the connection, but it just doesn't work for me because my attention just wasn't grabbed by it; which seemed it's only purpose.
You mentioned that the original draft was much shorter- well I think it could benefit from being trimmed dramatically. Most of time is spent trying to convince us that Amy and Joshua could get on so well after just meeting; which I suppose is necessary but it's also boring and still a little unlikely. I had no empathy for any of the characters- which was a big problem.
I suppose my biggest criticism here though is that I think it lacks originality. Plus the way the story is told doesn't offer any new take on the 'curse of the werewolf' tale from centuries ago. My main question is- what's here that hasn't been done many times before?
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ September 14, 2003 04:27 PM: Message edited by: Kev Owens ]</font>




Bookmarks